August 10, 2010
Melin’s Harder Tool Coatings
Melin’s Tool coatings available from Cutting Tools Chicago aka General Cutting Tools, harder than AlTiN coatings are applied via a process that combines AlTiN particles with an amorphous silicon nitride (Si3N4) matrix.
Seeing is believing, but it may require testing first. That was the case for toolmaker Melin Tool Co. when it was presented a coating called nACo, which the coating company said was harder, more wear resistant and had a higher hot hardness than AlTiN.
Melin Tool performed in house tests on nACo, which refers to nanocomposite, applying the coating to a series CCMG 45 six flute end mill for cutting hardened steel and comparing its tool life to the same style end mill coated with AlTiN. “We found about a 27 percent increase in tool life with the nACo coating,” said Mike Wochna, Melin Tool’s president.
Also, the nACo coated tool had a hardness of 45 GPa vs. 38 GPa for the AlTiN coated tool. “It creates a harder surface,” Wochna said of nACo.
Besides end mills, Melin Tool offers the nACo coating on its high performance, through coolant drills and ball nose end mills for making dies and molds. All three types of tools are made from 91 HRC solid carbide and are for cutting work piece materials of about 45 HRC to 65 HRC. In all cases, the tools are usually for cutting hardened steel, cast iron, high-silicon aluminum and superalloys.
Moreover, nACo has a high hot hardness. As a nanocomposite coating, it can withstand heat up to 1,200°C before it starts to oxidize and break down.
Filling the Spaces
nACo’s hardness results from its nanocomposite structure. The coating consists of nanocrystalline AlTiN grains embedded in an amorphous Si3N4 matrix. According to the coating and coating equipment company, Platit AG, Grenchen, Switzerland, this structure increases hardness partly because the matrix acts as a diffusion barrier, preventing the grains from growing. “The smaller the grains, the higher the hardness,” said Bo Torp, sales manager of Platit Inc., Libertyville, IL.
The matrix also contributes to the coating’s hardness. Torp compared the grain and matrix to wet sand. On a beach, a person’s feet usually sink into dry sand, but they won’t sink, or sink as far, in wet sand. The reason is the space between the grains is occupied by water, not air. Consequently, wet sand has a higher resistance, is harder. Likewise, the matrix occupies the space between the grains and makes the coating harder.
nACo’s nanocomposite structure can increase a machine shop’s productivity and reduce its costs. “You can improve feeds and speeds, or you can start running dry,” Torp said.
Melin Tool applies the coating in house with a Platit Pi80 coating machine. Torp estimated that the coating is appropriate for 90 percent of carbide tools. He added that it’s mainly unsuitable for HSS tools because the substrate usually is not hard enough to sustain the coating. nACo, however, can be applied to other styles of cutting tools and can be used when cutting different work piece materials.
General Cutting Tools is an authorized distributor for Melin Tools.
August 3, 2010
Coolant Through Solid Carbide End Mills
Solid Carbide End Mills Now Available With Internal Coolant
Series 57I8 (short version) and 57H8 (long version) for Titanium alloys are now available with internal coolant supply.
The VariMill 2 Solid Carbide End Mill with internal coolant supply provides excellent performance in slotting and profiling operations with longer tool life.
Usage
Materials: Series 57I8 and 57H8 – specifically for Titanium alloys and Stainless Steels.
Where higher metal removal rates will save the user time & money
Where different tools are used for roughing, semi-finishing and finishing passes
Where different tools are used for slotting and profiling operations
All VariMill II™ end mills are designed to efficiently remove the most amount of material in the least amount of time.
Target Markets
Aerospace, Energy
There are many competitors but no one dominates. In most markets Hanita’s VariMill I is often considered the leader in
this style end mill.
Features, Functions and Benefits
Customers will benefit from
Increased tool life
Better chip removal
Reduced machining temperature
High metal removal rates
Fewer setups
Only one tool for both roughing and finishing operations
These benefits are achieved due to
VariMill II™’s unique design which enables heavier cuts (slotting and heavy side milling)
5 Flutes with unequal flute spacing
Unique end geometry for maximum strength
Proprietary flute form enabling very heavy cuts
Internal coolant channels for increased tool life
Multiple OAL (overall length) and LOC (length od cut) options
Key Selling Arguments
Enables true, chatter-free machining to provide maximum metal removal rates
High metal removal rate
Increased tool life due to internal coolant
5 flutes increase feed per revolution and improve surface finishes
One tool for roughing and finishing operations
Effective slotting up to full 1xD axial depth
Effective in side milling up to 0.5D radial by 1.5xD axial depth
Product Portfolio
VariMill II™ Carbide End Mills with internal coolant are offered as standard with Weldon flats and with cutting diameters from 16mm to 25mm.
Series 57I8 (short version) and 57H8 (long version) for Titanium Alloys.
All standard tools from these series have
Internal coolant
5 flutes
AlTiN Coating
May 24, 2010
TuffCut® XR Beats Competitive Brands In 300 Series Stainless Test
Cutting Tools Chicago aka General Cutting Tools along with M.A. Ford High Performance Cutting Tools are bringing you real performance test information in 300 series stainless steels. Recently, an Oregon manufacturer tested the M.A. Ford® TuffCut® XR high performance end mill series 177 against 3 other brand named tools. Per the tool engineer at the manufacturer, “The test was designed for cutter failure.” The cutting parameters were: 3/8” diameter tool with a 3/4” Length of cut, 7,384 RPM, .0032 chip load at 3/4” depth of cut. The first test was ran at 15% of tool diameter radial engagement and for those tools that survived, a second test of 20% radial engagement was performed.
On the 1st test , the result was that one of the competitive brand tools produced considerable chatter and a 2nd tool of the same brand was chipped and worn. These two cutters did not make the “cut” for the 2nd test.
The results of the 2nd test at 20% radial engagement found that one brand performed well, but left a poor finish on the part. Another competitive brand broke. The M.A. Ford® TuffCut® XR performed with the least amount of chatter, produced a good finish on the part and the end mill was still in good shape.
Currently, the manufacturer is running 304 Stainless parts at 350-450 SFM with aggressive chip loads at 20% of diameter radial engagement. The M.A. Ford® TuffCut® 177 and 178 series end mill are performing very well in these applications. Next for the manufacturer is an application in 316 Stainless. They plan on using a TuffCut® XR 178 series as a rougher and the TuffCut® 180 series for the finish. Expectations are to reduce their tool path time by 25% and still maintain good cutter life.


You should put some images in here with certifications like the Better Business Bureau or any awards General Cutting Tools has.